PDA

View Full Version : Hillary Concedes tomorrow



LegalSmash
06-03-2008, 08:53 PM
Apparently, Hillary is finally conceded, realizing she is pwned. What do people think?

I for one hope she continues this shameless display of asanine feminine shit kicking. Maybe shell invoke 9/11 and Katrina as reasons she should stay in.

Also, if anyone is a newsweek subscriber, they have a really interesting article how this year, the candidates are trying to appease the lowest common denominator by drinking beer, eating spam-a-roni, and bilking the government out of food stamps. It is going to be a long, dire, election season.

Someone please revive President Eisenhower. plz

Blank
06-03-2008, 09:11 PM
I love an election year. Now is the time that the real shit starts coming out concerning the candidates prior history.

Doesn't Obama has a drug related charge/conviction?

LegalSmash
06-03-2008, 09:17 PM
I love an election year. Now is the time that the real shit starts coming out concerning the candidates prior history.

Doesn't Obama has a drug related charge/conviction?


maybe theyll show him in a black van with a baseball glove on a 60 lbs test fishing line.

Dracula
06-03-2008, 09:48 PM
I hope she gows down swinging makes it easier for MicCain to win vote republican!!!! I also bet if Obama becomes president some one will try and mabey succeed in killing him i just think there are still some people who just cant stand a black person in power.

PotshotPolka
06-03-2008, 09:54 PM
I think all the Hillary/Huckabee/Edwards/Guilliani supporters will become bitter with the other two choices and flock to the Libertarian party and elect Ron Paul.
That's what I wish I could say. :sad:
But it's sad when the only *viable* candidates left is one that can lip sync his speeches because they're all the exact same sh!t, and another candidate with a defibrillator strapped to his chest...

phatman76
06-03-2008, 11:29 PM
I would like to actually hear a position from Obama before formulating a position. All he seems capable of saying in his "emotional" and "tearful" speeches about America is vague platitudes of what we all want and what problems exist. In his victory speech he talked simultaneously of lowering the tax burden for the middle class (total BS, liberals are like snakes in the grass with tax promises) and then about spending more on programs that we already can't afford. He talks about how we will "secure" our nation by pulling out of a war, but I am only reminded of the military decay and lack of development that the last Democrat in office oversaw, which left us woefully unprepared for retaliating against our enemies in Afghanistan and taking Iraq, what should by all means have been a minor burden on the military of a nation as ridiculously powerful as ours.

Refusing to verbalize your positions is not post-partisan, it is just Obama hiding his radical and sometimes looney far-left and semi-socialist positions. He talks smooth enough to capture the imagination of the young and easily influenced democrats on college campuses.

LegalSmash
06-03-2008, 11:41 PM
Obama is in your house, stealin' your money for sh00es.

Red
06-04-2008, 12:56 AM
I would like to actually hear a position from Obama before formulating a position. All he seems capable of saying in his "emotional" and "tearful" speeches about America is vague platitudes of what we all want and what problems exist. In his victory speech he talked simultaneously of lowering the tax burden for the middle class (total BS, liberals are like snakes in the grass with tax promises) and then about spending more on programs that we already can't afford. He talks about how we will "secure" our nation by pulling out of a war, but I am only reminded of the military decay and lack of development that the last Democrat in office oversaw, which left us woefully unprepared for retaliating against our enemies in Afghanistan and taking Iraq, what should by all means have been a minor burden on the military of a nation as ridiculously powerful as ours.

Refusing to verbalize your positions is not post-partisan, it is just Obama hiding his radical and sometimes looney far-left and semi-socialist positions. He talks smooth enough to capture the imagination of the young and easily influenced democrats on college campuses.

Right on

Captain Colon
06-04-2008, 04:59 AM
But it's sad when the only *viable* candidates left is one that can lip sync his speeches because they're all the exact same sh!t, and another candidate with a defibrillator strapped to his chest...
Does anyone actually have anything to say about McCain besides "uhhhh he's old lol?" I mean I'm sure there's plenty of reasons not to support him but come on.

LegalSmash
06-04-2008, 06:33 AM
I can think of reasons to support him.... but only because I dont like socialism, and I think Hootie will be a collossal, unmitigated failure

Repeat
06-04-2008, 07:08 AM
I would like to actually hear a position from Obama before formulating a position. All he seems capable of saying in his "emotional" and "tearful" speeches about America is vague platitudes of what we all want and what problems exist. In his victory speech he talked simultaneously of lowering the tax burden for the middle class (total BS, liberals are like snakes in the grass with tax promises) and then about spending more on programs that we already can't afford. He talks about how we will "secure" our nation by pulling out of a war, but I am only reminded of the military decay and lack of development that the last Democrat in office oversaw, which left us woefully unprepared for retaliating against our enemies in Afghanistan and taking Iraq, what should by all means have been a minor burden on the military of a nation as ridiculously powerful as ours.

Refusing to verbalize your positions is not post-partisan, it is just Obama hiding his radical and sometimes looney far-left and semi-socialist positions. He talks smooth enough to capture the imagination of the young and easily influenced democrats on college campuses.

Dead on, my friend. The Democratic party, is a party of ideals and emotions. Sure, it'd be great for everyone to have a ton of money and have the same healthcare, etc, but the problem they don't address is that of "HOW to do that". All they spout off is "this would be great, that would be great, lets do this lets do that" but when it comes down to it, their plans suck, their ideas are flawed and socialistic.

LegalSmash
06-04-2008, 08:48 AM
Dead on, my friend. The Democratic party, is a party of pipe dream ideals and roller coaster, manic emotions. Sure, it'd be great for everyone to have a ton of money and have the same healthcare, etc, but the problem they don't address is that of "HOW to do that", the same way communists cant explain how to make everyone equal, not care about being rewarded for work, etc. . All they spout off is "this would be great, that would be great, lets do this lets do that" but when it comes down to it, their plans suck lack substance, or a grounding in reality, their ideas are flawed and socialistic and have time after time in the US wreaked havoc.

much better

Repeat
06-04-2008, 10:53 AM
much better

You booger! :-D

phatman76
06-04-2008, 07:15 PM
much better

Agreed, much better. In fact, pure win!

Repeat
06-04-2008, 07:18 PM
Agreed, much better. In fact, pure win!

THAT MEANS I GET HALF OF THE PURE WIN!




Right?!



Right?









.....right? :crying:

Italian Jew
06-04-2008, 09:27 PM
maybe a third

PotshotPolka
06-04-2008, 10:18 PM
(Drags the thread back onto topic)
She still hasn't said jackshit, she-just-won't-DIE!

phatman76
06-04-2008, 11:57 PM
THAT MEANS I GET HALF OF THE PURE WIN!



Yeah right, like legal would give you half of that win. Legal believes in Capitalism my friend, you have to work for your win in a free marketplace without heavy government interdiction...

LegalSmash
06-05-2008, 12:10 AM
I'll grant you nonexclusive license for a modest fee. However, I shall retain all rights of the half...

Repeat
06-05-2008, 12:11 AM
I'll grant you nonexclusive license for a modest fee. However, I shall retain all rights of the half...

Well, how abouts I don't kill you, and I get 75%? Sounds like a deal to me! You get to keep your life, AND you get 25%! YAY!


:-P



PS: I hate you Phatman.





(:-P)

trakaill
06-07-2008, 05:00 PM
if you guys look closely their is a pattern for president death and we are getting close to another death. I think a president died every 30 or 40 year or somethin, since the first president, and the last one died just about that many years ago. so it was nice meeting you obama!!!!! (I believe he will win because the Americans dont trust republican right now and hilary is evil so..)

PotshotPolka
06-07-2008, 05:18 PM
if you guys look closely their is a pattern for president death and we are getting close to another death. I think a president died every 30 or 40 year or somethin, since the first president, and the last one died just about that many years ago. so it was nice meeting you obama!!!!! (I believe he will win because the Americans dont trust republican right now and hilary is evil so..)

Not really true: 17 attempts in all (that have been reported)
Lincoln-1865
Garfield-1881
McKinley-1901
Kennedy-1962

Also I think we should resurrect Andrew Jackson and make him the democratic nominee because when an attempt was made on his life he beat down the assassin with his cane. :laugh:

Veggie
06-07-2008, 06:01 PM
Vice President Hillary rofl

Italian Jew
06-07-2008, 07:24 PM
I don't think anybody would kill Obama if that is the alternative...the racists tend to be morons/rednecks/too lazy and the uber feminists just don't assassinate people (not saying all who tried to choose her are all that, just some of the more prominent members of her...following). However, this all takes into consideration that he is elected, which we may not know because keep in mind, McCain is not full blown conservative, just Republican-ish, but republican-ish enough for a lot of people.

phatman76
06-07-2008, 08:42 PM
Assassination chances are low, we have a good Secret Service...but McCain could have medical shit or fall down a stairway or something....


and Obama has some major dying-related liabilities too. He says change so much I am worried he is just a stroke or brain damage patient that has been dolled up (not that the Democrats could come up with much better anyways).

I want to see a GIF that has a picture of Obama for a couple seconds and then the screen flashes those seizure-inducing patterns and says "change" all over the place. The already over-excited and under-intelligent preening Obama Girl liberal masses will roll across the floor gagging on their own spit, actualizing their clearly retarded thought processes....

Italian Jew
06-07-2008, 11:32 PM
sweet...

LegalSmash
06-08-2008, 12:07 AM
Kt47FdrXyoU

trakaill
06-08-2008, 01:19 AM
what ever someone is gonna fuckin die soon i feel it. Im not racist whatso ever but common a women or a black president in the USA. Id like to see it I think either someone is gonna cheat to make republican win no matter what or someone is gonna die im tellling you.. This nation is to discriminatory to let this happen..i wish it was different and everyone could chill out
BY THE WAY lol at that vid

LegalSmash
06-08-2008, 01:41 AM
what ever someone is gonna fuckin die soon i feel it. Im not racist whatso ever but common a women or a black president in the USA. Id like to see it I think either someone is gonna cheat to make republican win no matter what or someone is gonna die im tellling you.. This nation is to discriminatory to let this happen..i wish it was different and everyone could chill out
BY THE WAY lol at that vid


Dude, its not that someone will cheat, that is rather one sided view of it, its people start to realize the phenomenally complex line of bullshit that the democrats come up with, and they decide: well fuck that.

I'd love to see a black president, one with military service, ACTUAL Senate experience, and an ACTUAL position platform outside of repeatedly chanting "change" like a hari krishna at the fucking air port.


For now though

http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/2/24/Centerofthesun.gif

James
06-08-2008, 05:26 AM
I think that Barack has a very small chance of becoming president, because there are quite a lot of racists in America (yes admit it) white supremacists etc and he would be the very first black president if he would win. ^^

On the other hand, if Hilary had gotten to be the candidate and won, not many people would vote for a woman as a president, because of sexists, rednecks etc.

LegalSmash
06-08-2008, 10:54 AM
I think that Barack has a very small chance of becoming president, because there are quite a lot of racists in America (yes admit it) white supremacists etc and he would be the very first black president if he would win. ^^

On the other hand, if Hilary had gotten to be the candidate and won, not many people would vote for a woman as a president, because of sexists, rednecks etc.

Actually, you are half wrong,

Obama's problem is not white supremacists, in fact, they are a pretty small minority, his problem is his change idea has no real substance, he just constantly invokes the word change like a gummy bear drinks that juice. If he doesnt get elected, James, its not about race, its about him fucking up somehow bc right now the election is pretty much his to win, as all things stand. Liberal Guilt White people are the ones voting for Barack Jesus Christ John F Kennedy Jr Obama .

Hil-Dog never really had a chance, only butch, 1960s feminists and grandmas wanted hillary, she couldnt attract the popular vote, black people like her husband and hate her, and in the end, she was a conniving, foot in mouth imbecile.

It goes beyond race here... if it 1955 I'd say it was race exclusively. At this point however, its just not.

Italian Jew
06-08-2008, 07:42 PM
Actually, you are half wrong,

Obama's problem is not white supremacists, in fact, they are a pretty small minority, his problem is his change idea has no real substance, he just constantly invokes the word change like a gummy bear drinks that juice. If he doesnt get elected, James, its not about race, its about him fucking up somehow bc right now the election is pretty much his to win, as all things stand. Liberal Guilt White people are the ones voting for Barack Jesus Christ John F Kennedy Jr Obama .

Hil-Dog never really had a chance, only butch, 1960s feminists and grandmas wanted hillary, she couldnt attract the popular vote, black people like her husband and hate her, and in the end, she was a conniving, foot in mouth imbecile.

It goes beyond race here... if it 1955 I'd say it was race exclusively. At this point however, its just not.


I know...Obama won by a landslide and McCain just screams a gimme race...I see the truth now!

phatman76
06-08-2008, 10:40 PM
It will be the greatest subversion of truth and realism to the American people in history if Obama actually gets into the white house holding onto his vapid platform of "change" and "post-partisanship."

No way around it, Obama is on the far, far left, while McCain is basically sitting right in the middle (leaning on the moderate, pro-war, vaguely moral left to be exact). Obama believes in government intervention and ownership of key industries (medicine) and in stupid, pie-in-the-sky trade deals (anti-NAFTA, anti-Business model), a weak defense (no border initiatives, take military home so he can make it smaller), legislated repeal of any sort of standard of human respect (or lack thereof i.e. legalize crime-causing drugs, euthanasia), and a weak foreign policy (isolate ourselves from our allies, cow to the will of the U.N., retreat from bold unilateralism to pacifist multilateral inaction).

I have always believed that the far left is so close to socialist totalitarianism it is scary. They believe that the government should rule everything we do, under the auspices of "democracy" and "equality" of course. They are willing to sacrifice liberty on the altar of "equality", a free marketplace of goods and ideas on the altar of "fairness". The founding fathers did not fight and die to ensure everyone had a "living wage," but to ensure that we were not given unfair orders and laws by an unheeding and distant national government (sounds familiar eh, Washington D.C. is the new Great Britain). This is unacceptable, and sooner or later (unless the severely slanted and anemic media refuses to shine a light on it), the American people will discover just how dangerously radical Obama is. It isn't just the pro-defeatist and self-hating Reverand Wrightism. It isn't just the economic and political naiveté, it is the inherently self-destructive socialist-leaning ideals that Obama appeals to, which are eventually going to destroy this nation's pre-eminence if adopted.

Italian Jew
06-08-2008, 11:12 PM
I would say our preeminence was doomed once we had it...nothing lasts forever.

It appears the politics section has turned into a McCain propaganda camp. Not saying that it isn't allowed or anything, just that I would prefer (and I would assume the wise users here as well) to get facts from a source that is as little biased as possible. However if I start seeing political ads pop up on my screen when I go to the main page, I will start asking questions.

LitKey
06-08-2008, 11:32 PM
SteamGamers fairness doctrine?

Italian Jew
06-08-2008, 11:48 PM
Just have the horse head popup...it is hypnotizing

You could probably get people to do whatever you want with that thing

Although, I do prefer the Hypnotoad

http://img373.imageshack.us/img373/8858/hypnotoaddl8.gif

LegalSmash
06-09-2008, 12:31 AM
SteamGamers fairness doctrine?



ROFL. "fairness doctrine"

phatman76
06-09-2008, 12:34 AM
I would say our preeminence was doomed once we had it...nothing lasts forever.

It appears the politics section has turned into a McCain propaganda camp. Not saying that it isn't allowed or anything, just that I would prefer (and I would assume the wise users here as well) to get facts from a source that is as little biased as possible. However if I start seeing political ads pop up on my screen when I go to the main page, I will start asking questions.

Lol, you think I like McCain? Fuck the bastard. He is a liberal hawk. He is a hawk, but still a liberal. He believes in spending, taxes and stupid immigration policies just like the next democrat down the aisle. He only seems nice because that barfing feeling you get while voting for him goes away the second you see Obama.

"Warhawk," such an ugly term. There used to be a time when everyone thought of foreign policy the same way - unilateral, deadly force whenever necessary, diplomatic compromise when possible, lose never. Call that hawkish, I call it sensible.

As for pre-eminence going away, you are sorely mistaken. The United States will never lose pre-eminence, even if another country becomes a greater economic powerhouse (especially if that country is or becomes a democracy -
China/India?), because of its ridiculous technological and military lead. When you come right down to it, we are the only ones who have gone to the moon with people, gone to mars (and made it down to the surface with no major fuck-ups), left the solar system, and built a military that makes any attempt at military action anywhere without our knowledge and decision to not interven virtually impossible. Don't forget, teh internets is the property of the DoD, not "the free world" or some BS like that. The fact that you can waste most of your life playing videogames, getting fat and arguing with people hundreds of miles away is testament to the USA's preeminence in the world. Let China keep making children's toys and a children's army, we have all the chips and all the bombs, and we won't give them away until they march to the tune of democracy...

LegalSmash
06-09-2008, 12:46 AM
^ QFTMFT

We should have a party where we eat steak, drink scotch, smoke cigars, and shoot skeet plates with the face of marx on them.

Red
06-09-2008, 01:08 AM
Or how about shooting dumbasses wearing che shirts

PotshotPolka
06-09-2008, 09:24 AM
Or how about shooting dumbasses wearing che shirts

It's called Kent State.

LegalSmash
06-09-2008, 10:26 AM
it was a good day.

Red
06-09-2008, 10:52 AM
it was a good day.

zing!

PotshotPolka
06-09-2008, 11:08 AM
it was a good day.

You scare me... in a good way?

LegalSmash
06-09-2008, 05:53 PM
Let me say this:

Freedom of Expression can be regulated in time, place, and manner, in a content neutral way. Bashing in the skulls of hippies (however fun it may be) for holding up signs protesting a war is WRONG. As is tazing a guy for communicating his viewpoint on a public building.

However, bashing in the skulls of hippies that decided to get rowdy while protesting IS perfectly allowable, its called riot control. As is tazing a guy who starts screaming obscenity, fighting words, or other NONprotected speech (not protected BTW) and gets rowdy when told to leave, or resists ejection when it is lawful.

What surprises the shit out of me is that the Klan, the NeoNazis, the Minutemen, shit, even the Nation of Islam can protest, spew pure hatred into the air (which IS constitutionally protected, so long as the content is kept at just that), and they can behave in a civilized manner while doing it, BUT a bunch of shitheads from FSU, UF, U of M, FIU and other schools cant avoid throwing shit at police and getting the hell kicked out of themselves at the WTO summit in Miami in 2003. The same applies to Kent State.

Is it a lack of tact? Brain Cells?

PotshotPolka
06-11-2008, 12:24 AM
Let me say this:

Freedom of Expression can be regulated in time, place, and manner, in a content neutral way. Bashing in the skulls of hippies (however fun it may be) for holding up signs protesting a war is WRONG. As is tazing a guy for communicating his viewpoint on a public building.

However, bashing in the skulls of hippies that decided to get rowdy while protesting IS perfectly allowable, its called riot control. As is tazing a guy who starts screaming obscenity, fighting words, or other NONprotected speech (not protected BTW) and gets rowdy when told to leave, or resists ejection when it is lawful.

What surprises the shit out of me is that the Klan, the NeoNazis, the Minutemen, shit, even the Nation of Islam can protest, spew pure hatred into the air (which IS constitutionally protected, so long as the content is kept at just that), and they can behave in a civilized manner while doing it, BUT a bunch of shitheads from FSU, UF, U of M, FIU and other schools cant avoid throwing shit at police and getting the hell kicked out of themselves at the WTO summit in Miami in 2003. The same applies to Kent State.

Is it a lack of tact? Brain Cells?

Perhaps....they simply believe that if justice is on your side.... no scratch that. Douchebags just need entertainment, that's all. I think my response to Misanthrope a while back is still applicable to this situation.